The expansive field of cognitive science, with its diverse disciplines and rigorous research, offers fascinating insights for our Buddhist practice. Consider the ongoing debate around AI's potential for sentience, exemplified by ChatGPT. Recognizing human-like cognitive abilities in AI could profoundly impact Buddhist wisdom and even challenge core doctrines.
Would anyone ask, "Could AI ever think like us?" The question seemed unthinkable, a mere hypothetical. But that is exactly what happened. It was brought up with me recently by none other than a prominent quantum physicist in Silicon Valley. This esteemed scientist, a key consultant on quantum mechanics for giants like Google. He used to be a strong believer in Buddhism, but now he's not so sure. He wonders if machines could learn to think like humans, truly feel, and understand the world as we do. We debated, but language was a barrier. Though my daughter was trying to bridge by remote translation through an iPad, we could not go too deep. Nevertheless, we found common ground in some Buddhist principles by the end.
If AI could have human-like innate cognitive abilities, it would shake up the very core of Buddhist teachings, maybe even rewrite them entirely. All followers of the Buddha, both those who guide and those who seek guidance, are foolish. This could lead people to believe that scientific pursuits hold the sole key to truth, diminishing the value of Buddhist practice. But that's not true.
We found common ground on certain Buddhist principles because we both believe that AI lacks the same cognitive abilities as humans. Modern cognitive science is indeed complex, with diverse schools of thought and experts, and no single universally accepted overarching system. While some compare brain function to computers, human cognition involves aspects like awareness and intuition that go beyond mere computation. Honestly, bridging the gap between Buddhist and non-Buddhist perspectives on consciousness can be a complex endeavor, often requiring rigorous logical analysis and reasoning. Yet, Buddhism offers a straightforward way to experience that human cognition is not simply a computational activity: meditation. When meditation reaches a certain depth, physical phenomena may fade away, offering a direct, personal experience beyond the limitations of computational models.
For many Buddhists, this question finds a clear answer through the Madhyamaka and Yogacara. These doctrines point out that matter is empty by nature. If its essence does not exist, how could matter then aggregate to form cognitive faculties? While this concept resonates readily with some Buddhists, explaining it to those outside the Buddhist context or with limited knowledge of its teachings as the Five Great Treatises can be challenging.
Beyond logical arguments, Buddhists offer meditation as a powerful avenue for exploring the non-computational nature of cognition. Experienced practitioners, at advanced stages of their practice, may find that physical experiences fade away. Bodily sensations, sight, and hearing fade away, leaving behind a state of pure awareness. It's important to note, however, that this is not true enlightenment, but rather a deep meditative state within the Alayavijnana.
The Buddhist phrase, "All phenomena arise from the mind," whispers a profound truth: everything we perceive is just a projection of the mind. It's a statement that resonates both logically and philosophically, explored in depth by Madhyamaka and Yogacara. While delving into the intricacies of their arguments would be a time-consuming detour, the core message remains simple: our experience of reality is fundamentally shaped by our minds. This truth isn't just intellectual. It can be directly experienced through meditation, particularly practices like the Four-Negation meditation. As you meditate to a certain point, bodily sensations, sight, and hearing will gradually fade away. When this state is deepened, all physical phenomena vanish, leaving behind the pure awareness. This effectively disproves the theory that "mind is a result of material movement" because after the material phenomena disappeared, the mind is still there.
However, this method of using meditation is only suitable for some seasoned Buddhists. If you tell a seasoned Buddhist that "the world is material," he will only look at you helplessly, thinking you are naive, and will not bother to engage in a debate with you.
Imagine telling someone who's never seen snow that everything feels soft and cold when it falls. They might raise an eyebrow and think you're a bit fanciful. Explaining complex experiences like deep meditation can be similar.
For experienced meditators, the idea that the world unfolds within the mind feels as real as sunlight on their skin. But for newbies, it might sound strange, like "the body vanishes, and you see with your mind!" It's like sharing stories of a beautiful, hidden valley – those who've visited understand, but others need a different path to see its wonders. We need to find ways to spark curiosity. To help them intellectually understand that the world is not material through inferential inquiry, we can introduce them to Madhyamaka and Yogacara. Over time, they might lead someone to explore meditation for themselves, to discover their own hidden valley within. It's not about making them believe anything, but about opening a door to a new way of seeing the world. And who knows, maybe one day they'll tell us about their own magical stories from the depths of their minds!
